Daily Kos

SUBSCRIBE! (or exclude from AdBlock)

If you use ad blocking software while viewing Daily Kos, you're getting all the benefits of our site but we're not getting any of the advertisement revenue associated with your visits. This site relies on ad revenue for daily operations: a decrease in the number of ads seen means a decrease in the funding available to run the site, to pay those that work on it, and to create improved site features.

We won't stop you from using ad blocking software, but if you do use it we ask you to support Daily Kos another way: by purchasing a site subscription. A subscription is an inexpensive way to support the site that eliminates the advertisements without using ad blocking software.

Revenue generated from the subscriptions goes to the Daily Kos fellowship program, providing a steady income for bloggers and allowing them to concentrate full time on expanding the reach and influence of the netroots through a variety of projects.

By using ad blocking software, you may be hiding the site ads but you're also reducing the site's primary source of revenue. So if you must use one, please do your part to support the site and the people that bring it to you by purchasing a site subscription today.

To exclude Daily Kos from Adblock Plus, in Firefox click Tools > Adblock Plus > click on Add Filter, and copy/paste @@http://*dailykos.com/* to the field, then click Add Filter at the bottom of the window, then OK.

[B]oth inspiring and terrifying. Now that we know we can "take on the system," it's each of our responsibility to do exactly that. -Wes Boyd, Co-Founder, MoveOn.org

Available 8/20. Pre-order at Amazon or your favorite retailer.

Edwards Admits Affair, Take Two

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 01:41:41 PM PDT

Mostly outrage is being expressed here about John Edwards' admission of having an affair. A sampling from the previous thread:

georgia10:

Fuck John Edwards.  I have zero respect for his self-serving ass.

I don’t really care what he does in his private life.  If he wants to screw around, fine.  I don’t agree with it, obviously, but it’s ultimately between him and Elizabeth.

But he chose to be a presidential candidate, cheating on a wife with cancer, and then running for the Democratic nomination with that fact tucked away waiting to break out as an October surprise.  Not only is that an incredibly selfish act, but he could have single-handedly given us another 8 years of Republican rule if he won the primaries.

His hubris makes my blood boil.  To think that he ran with this thinking he wouldn't endanger not just the presidency but this country too is just repulsive.

hekebolos:

I'm not going to listen to anyone who says "oh, this is just between him and Elizabeth" because that's not how we treat Newt Gingrich.

And second: what if he had become the nominee and this came out?  He would have basically handed the presidency to the Republican nominee.

Self-serving egomaniac with a distinct lack of moral fiber.

pat 208:

He had an affair, THEN asked us to nominate him.

He's not getting any more invitations to my Christmas parties, that's for sure.

I am SO glad he's not our nominee. But he put us all at risk by asking running.

And some objections to the expressed outrage:

RNinNC

WELL over 50% of married people have affairs. Especially men. McCain as well, but there's no massive MSM shock over that one. We can judge and throw rocks all we want, but dismissing someone for an affair is way overblown.

I'm stunned to see this place explode like this.

MrHinkyDink:

Jesus, you'd think JE was the first politician to have an affair, when they've been doing it for thousands of years.

Is it wrong? Yes. Does it erase all the good things about JE? No.

He's not evil. He just made a huge mistake. It's one he should have to pay consequences for, but it's certainly not an unforgivable sin.

And, of course, the top recommended diary right now by David Mizner:

This is none of our business.

This is an American sickness, this need to know--the belief that we're entitled to know--about the sexual lives of politicians.

But but but, you don't have a problem with the sex, you say, you have a problem with his lying about it. Yeah, that's what Ken Starr said too.

And a counter-argument to the recommended diary, this comeback by Meteor Blades:

You’re an asshole, John Edwards. Adultery is a private offense, of course, a matter to be resolved between you and your wife. How she chooses to deal with this ought not to be something that holier-than-thou pundits argue she should behave the way so many did in the case of Hillary Clinton in regards to Bill’s philandering. If she forgives you, as millions have done for their straying spouses, then count yourself lucky.

But I don’t forgive you. And I suspect many of your long-time supporters will not either. How can we? Your betrayal of us and the Democratic Party was not a private matter.

House and Senate Race Roundup, 8/8/08

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 01:30:37 PM PDT

NH-Sen:  Reid Wilson suggests that John Sununu's close ties to indicted Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens may prove a serious liability for the junior Senator from New Hampshire (Stevens' campaign committee, it seems, paid for a couple of fishing junkets for Stevens and Sununu).  

Wilson goes so far, in fact, as to compare Stevens to the infamous Jack Abramoff:

In 2006, a number of Republican members of Congress lost their seats because of associations with lobbyist Jack Abramoff. This year's version of Abramoff may be Alaska Senator Ted Stevens, and his close relationships to a few fellow senators is causing fits, none more so than for New Hampshire's John Sununu.

While many senators have donated contributions from Stevens to charity, Sununu was already having trouble with a 2004 fishing trip he took to Alaska with the state's senior senator. The trip to the Kenai River Classic was paid for by a joint campaign account including Stevens' and Senator Lisa Murkowski's campaigns and Stevens' leadership PAC. Also at the event was VECO Corp. president Bill Allen, whose company is at the center of the controversy surrounding Stevens and who was convicted in the probe.

The campaign of Sununu's Democratic opponent, Jeanne Shaheen, will not be inclined to let this slide:

Sununu wasn't the only senator who hit the events -- five others made the trip in 2004 -- but he's the only one facing a tough re-election fight this year. His opponent, former Governor Jeanne Shaheen, has hammered Sununu for his ties to Stevens, and while Stevens has refunded contributions from the Alaskan's various campaign and PAC accounts, Shaheen's campaign now wants the full costs of both trips reimbursed.

MN-Sen: Remember Norm Coleman's housing mini-scandal? The very senior Senator from Minnesota has a nifty basement apartment in a townhouse on Capitol Hill, where he lives when the Senate is in session. Since the townhouse is owned by a friend and business associate, Coleman pays all of $600 in rent, and even that is apparently optional.

As first reported by National Journal, Coleman rents a Capitol Hill apartment in Republican operative Jeff Larson’s million dollar home for a mere $600 a month, and on two occasions he failed to pay any rent until questioned about it by a reporter and on another occasion he paid with used furniture. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has filed a complaint with the Senate Ethics Committee alleging that Coleman violated Senate ethics rules. Coleman has still failed to provide documentation of a lease or answer who pays the utilities for the apartment.

Now I know that in New York City, $600 a month will get you a whole pile of nothing, apartment wise. But maybe things are different in DC? New York is very expensive, after all.

Well, it turns out that not only are things not especially different in DC (barring a cozy relationship with your landlord like Normie has), but in Minnesota as well.

Lucky Norm.

MS-Sen: A Mississippi news station notes that Roger Wicker is having a tough time remembering the (intensely negative) contents of his campaign ads...which he approved of course:

Seems to me that Wicker is either lying, or just isn't paying any attention to the kind of ads he's running (and approving, as required by elections law).

Or perhaps both are true. Lies, and failure to do due diligence.

NE-Sen: Scott Kleeb's first TV ad:

Very wholesome, no?

ME-Sen: The latest (60-second) ad from Democratic candidate Tom Allen:

MA-Sen: If you're the kind of person that just HAS to stop and watch a car wreck, or if you're heavily into schadenfreude, check out Rasmussen's latest MA-Sen poll.

House Races

AZ-01: The Cook Political Report sees the race in Arizona's First District (formerly held by the scandal-plagued Rick Renzi) slowly drifting away from the GOP, and has changed their rating of the race to "Leans Democratic" from "Tossup".

Arizona’s congressional primaries will not be held until September 2nd, but the identities of the party nominees in northern Arizona’s sprawling 1st district are fairly clear. EMILY’s List-endorsed Democratic state Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick held over 10 times the cash on hand of her nearest primary opponent, former TV reporter Mary Kim Titla, at the end of June. Similarly, GOP former mining industry official Sydney Hay is all but officially her party’s standard-bearer after Republicans could not convince several of their top choices to run.

The race leans Democratic, it seems, due to a combination of the ethical cloud over Renzi, the Republican Hay's unabashed arch-conservatism and lobbyist background, and Kirkpatrick's own popularity:

McCain’s presence atop the ballot should help Republicans across the board in Arizona, but Democrats may hold the megaphone in this expensive district covered by the Phoenix media market. The lingering taste of the Renzi land deal fiasco may have also soured voters on congressional Republicans here.

Some Republicans privately concede that Kirkpatrick is a good fit for this district and that the GOP may not have the money to help Hay counter a barrage of Democratic ads. But the bottom line may be that Democrats got their top choice to run here and Republicans did not. This seat moves to the Lean Democratic column.

TN-01: Tennessee's First will have a new Representative next year, as Republican Phil Roe upset incumbent David Davis in the GOP primary yesterday, by just over 500 votes.

Rep. David Davis (R-Tenn.) was upset Thursday in a little-noticed Volunteer State primary.

Johnson City Mayor Phil Roe (R), who finished in fourth place in the 2006 GOP primary that Davis won, took this cycle's primary by about 500 votes — or less than 1 percent — according to the Associated Press.

Davis won the 13-way 2006 primary with just 22 percent of the vote. He has established a very low profile on Capitol Hill since coming to Congress.

This has little impact on Democratic hopes -  the district has been Republican-held since 1881, and with a PVI of R+14, it is Tennessee's most Republican district. Nevertheless, it's kind of interesting, especially as Davis becomes the first Congressman from Tennessee to be successfully primaried since 1966.

And as Kagro X noted, it's especially significant that part of the reason Davis lost was because his opponent - his Republican opponent - was successfully able to portray Davis as a tool of Big Oil. From Ben Pershing:  

The heated Democratic primary contest between Rep. Steve Cohen and attorney Nikki Tinker fizzled out at the Memphis polls Thursday, as Cohen easily overcame Tinker's late invocation of race and religion and cruised to a 60-point victory. Instead, a northeastern Tennessee contest that had flew below the radar ended up headlining the day's electoral news, as freshman Rep. David Davis unexpectedly lost narrowly in the GOP primary to Johnson City Mayor Phil Roe in the 1st district.

Davis is the fourth House incumbent to lose in a primary this year, following Utah Rep. Chris Cannon (R) and Maryland Reps. Wayne Gilchrest and Al Wynn (D). Though the district is heavily Republican and will stay in the GOP column in November, Democrats are already highlighting the race as an example of how they believe the politics of energy can play in their favor. Roe focused his campaign on charges that Davis was in the pocket of "Big Oil."

If Democratic positions and talking points on energy can play in a Republican primary in such a conservative district, there's no telling how far they might be able to go in November. We'll have to see how hard the party is actually willing to push back on energy, of course.

NM-01, NM-02, NM-03: Democratic House Caucus Chair (and former DCCC chair) Rahm Emanuel was in New Mexico yesterday, gigging with all three of the state's Democratic House candidates: Martin Heinrich in NM-01, Harry Teague in NM-02, and Ben Ray Lujan in NM-03.

Emanuel spoke about Democratic gains in 2006, made under his stewardship of the DCCC:

Yes, the war was a big factor. But the deteriorating economic condition in the middle class was a big factor in the fact that the Democrats took back the House and the Senate.  And it will again be a contributing factor because people realize that under the Republican Party stewardship, the middle class has been hurt.

Both Heinrich and Teague are on Red to Blue as we speak (Lujan is cruising in a traditionally Democratic district). As a swing state with two top-tier House races, a U.S. Senate race, and the promise of an entirely new slate of federal representation next year (except for Sen. Jeff Bingaman), New Mexico is one of the most exciting - and promising -  states in the country this cycle for political junkies. It's good to see that the national party leadership is conscious of this fact.

KY-03: Very bad news for fans of former GOP Rep. Anne Northup. As she seeks to defeat incumbent Democratic freshman John Yarmuth in a rematch of their 2006 affair, Northup's campaign is apparently sputtering to the extent that she has fired her campaign manager, Scott Will:

"There's not much more to say," Jackson said. "Scott's a great guy and did a great job. But a lot of time, it comes down to personalities and management style."

Jackson said the loss of a campaign manager exactly 13 weeks before the election will not harm Northup's chances against incumbent Democrat John Yarmuth, who won the seat from her in 2006.

"We still believe this is a five-point race," he said.

Frankly, if it really is a five-point race, given Yarmuth's relative popularity, the bad political environment for Republicans, and Northup's high-profile losses in 2006 and in the 2007 governor's race, it's a crime for them to fire Scott Will. If Northup really is in the race to that degree, there's no reason to change horses in midstream.

Perhaps, then, the campaign isn't really going as well as they would like.

(H/T: RandySF).

On the web:
Orange to Blue ActBlue Page

Edwards Admits Affair

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 12:50:37 PM PDT

John Edwards is an embarrassment to his Party, and of course, to Elizabeth:

John Edwards repeatedly lied during his Presidential campaign about an extramarital affair with a novice filmmaker, the former Senator admitted to ABC News today.

In an interview for broadcast tonight on Nightline, Edwards told ABC News correspondent Bob Woodruff he did have an affair with 44-year old Rielle Hunter, but said that he did not love her.

Edwards also denied he was the father of Hunter's baby girl, Frances Quinn, although the one-time Democratic Presidential candidate said he has not taken a paternity test.

Well, since he didn't love her, it's okay that he made a run for the Democratic Party's nomination knowing that he was lying through his teeth about this. And a Friday news dump on the day of the opening ceremonies of the Olympics? Coward.  

Midday Open Thread

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 12:11:15 PM PDT

  • What Netroots Nation attendees figured out first-hand: Austin is the hardest-drinking city in America. Yee-haw. - SusanG
  • Thirty-four years ago today, President Nixon resigned:

    From the discussions I have had with Congressional and other leaders, I have concluded that because of the Watergate matter I might not have the support of the Congress that I would consider necessary to back the very difficult decisions and carry out the duties of this office in the way the interests of the Nation would require.

    I have never been a quitter. To leave office before my term is completed is abhorrent to every instinct in my body. But as President, I must put the interest of America first. America needs a full-time President and a full-time Congress, particularly at this time with problems we face at home and abroad.

    To continue to fight through the months ahead for my personal vindication would almost totally absorb the time and attention of both the President and the Congress in a period when our entire focus should be on the great issues of peace abroad and prosperity without inflation at home.

    Therefore, I shall resign the Presidency effective at noon tomorrow. Vice President Ford will be sworn in as President at that hour in this office.

    - Plutonium Page

  • Steve Pearce provides unintentional comedy gold. - Plutonium Page
  • Dick Cheney will be speaking at the GOP convention on the same night as George Bush...both on the first night so McCain can get back to pretending he never met them.
  • After spending the night in jail for violating the bail agreement, Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick has been charged with two felony assault counts, and:

    In order to get out of jail, Kilpatrick must pay a $50,000 cash bond and wear an electronic tether.

  • John McCain doesn't have a clue about the Hamdan case. Said McCain:

    The jury found that the prosecution lawyers had proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Hamdan had aided terrorists by supplying weapons to Al Qaeda and Taliban forces in Afghanistan.

    Wrong, John. But it sure sounded scary.

  • Don't read this if you plan on watching China's opening ceremonies tonight.

McCain's "respectful" campaign

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 11:20:43 AM PDT

How come all the cool YouTube grassroots political activity is coming from our side alone?

McCain to return (some) donations

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 10:20:37 AM PDT

Calling it a "precautionary effort," John McCain's campaign said yesterday:

...that it would return all the contributions solicited for it by the Jordanian business partner of a prominent Florida fund-raiser for Mr. McCain.

For the McCain camp, the decision caps a queasy two days in which news accounts scrutinized a cluster of more than $50,000 in unusual contributions from a single extended family of Californians, the Abdullahs, and several of their friends.  [...]

The donations came under scrutiny because of their large size and the fact that for the most part, the Abdullahs do not appear wealthy. In addition, several of them interviewed expressed indifference or even hostility to Mr. McCain’s candidacy.

All this taken together has raised the question of whether at least some of the family and their friends may have been donors in name only who were reimbursed by someone trying to skirt individual contribution limits.

It raised the question? It seems pretty clear that there is no question about the fact that a $9,200 donation from a Taco Bell manager, or another $9,200 from a man who, after first denying the donation, said of McCain:

He’s like a worse copy than Bush. I’m still not going to vote for him."

...does more than raise a question. And while the McCain campaign is still feeling queasy, perhaps they could look at the donation from the Hess Corporation office manager who decided to hang onto her 15 year old car so she could give McCain $57,000.

Update by SusanG: Marc Ambinder asks his own very interesting question about these donations:

If there were a group of questionable donations all with the name Abdullah
that were funneled through a guy in Jordan
who is a Jordanian national
who is under investigation for war profiteering
and it were Barack Obama
instead of John McCain
would this be a bigger deal?

Second update by SusanG: And another great question posed by our own Zackpunk:

So wait a minute

Does that mean this Taco Bell manager gets to keep the money being "returned" to him?

Wouldn't that be a hoot?

WA-08: Burner Reports Big Money Lead

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 09:15:37 AM PDT

July started out incredibly badly for Darcy Burner and her family. While the family is still dealing with the loss of pretty much everything they owned, Darcy's future remains as bright as ever. That's in large part thanks to the netroots, who stepped up to help make sure that her campaign could go on in the face of her family's catastrophe.

Saying that we stepped up is putting it mildly:

Burner's campaign has just turned in their pre-primary filing with the FEC, and she's reporting to have raised nearly $351,000 in the month of July, ending the period with close to $1.5 million in the bank. Those are monstrous numbers, especially when you consider that only $18,000 of her total came from PACs.

Reichert's numbers are in, too, and and it doesn't look good for the incumbent. His July take, was just $115K.

Here's the breakdown in their reports for July and for the election cycle to date.

Total for July:
Burner: $350,897.68
Reichert: $115,474.88

From Individuals:
Burner: $329,022.30
Reichert: $49,159.88

Small Individual Donations:
Burner: $186,832.07
Reichert: $8,544.00

Total for Cycle from Individuals:
Burner: $1,995,109.43 (85%)
Reichert: $1,084,379.23 (58%)

PACs for July:
Burner: $18,100.00
Reichert: $62,250.00

Total for Cycle from PACs:
Burner: $296,859.24 (13%)
Reichert: $570,645.46 (31%)

Total for Cycle:
Burner: $2,337,372.67
Reichert: $1,866,086.08

Refunded in Cycle:
Burner: $6,550.01
Reichert: $56,970.00

Cash on Hand:
Burner: $1,476,757.53
Reichert: $928,113.96

It doesn't really get better than that. The difference between a people-powered progressive campaign and that of an establishment Republican really couldn't be made more clear. Also note that Burner's ActBlue numbers are at $416,118, or just under the difference in cash on hand. One of the reasons Darcy gets so much support is because, even though she's not in Congress yet, she's already a leader.

And she'll be talking about one of her projects, the Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq, today on Meet the Bloggers (http://meetthebloggers.org/ [link corrected]) at 1:00 EDT. Her appearance will be followed by a roundtable discussion on Iraq by David Goldstein, Matt Stoller, and me. You can stream the show live and participate through the comment thread, or you can view an archive after it's posted.

Phoenix Reporter Details McCain's Sordid Political Past

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 08:05:01 AM PDT

(From the diaries. SusanG)

Amy Silverman knows her subject. She writes,

I've been a writer and editor at [the Phoenix] New Times for 15 years. For much of that time, I wrote about Arizona politics, which is to say that I wrote about John McCain. It's still odd to see the guy in the spotlight, because for quite a while, I was pretty much the only one covering him. I never did fall for him in the way reporters fall for politicians, probably because he wasn't much to fall for back in the early 1990s. In those days, McCain was still rehabilitating the image he'd later sell to the national media. He was known then for cavorting in the Bahamas with Charlie Keating, rather than for fighting for campaign finance reform and limited government spending.

Silverman has written an excellent compendium of all things McCain. Think of it as McCain 101 -- a primer for pulling information about Grumpy McBush to dazzle your friends and befuddle your enemies (not to mention phone banking and such). I'll share some material from the story below the fold, but you should definitely read the entire thing. It's a big one; pack a lunch.

(Note: AxmxZ did a much shorter diary on this article yesterday, though I didn't see it until after writing my own. He deserves some recognition.)

Let's do it in timeline format, kinda like we do it at the History Commons:.

1982: McCain, recently remarried to Arizona beer heiress Cindy Hensley, moves to Phoenix and wins a seat in the US House. He quickly forges a relationship with the Democratic House eminence from Tucson, Mo Udall, who although a strong progressive, has always welcomed the opportunity to work with Republicans.

1982-88: McCain takes over $100,000 in contributions from our well-remembered buddy from Lincoln S&L, Charles Keating, and his employees. McCain and Keating are very close, with McCain frequently joining Keating on outings to the Bahamas, on Keating's dime. Keating also has what Silverman calls a "business relationship" with Jim Hensley, Cindy Hensley's father, and with Cindy as well.

1986: During McCain's race for the Senate, Arizona Democrats ask the Udall staffers not to allow McCain to cling too closely to Udall, worrying that McCain is using Udall as a campaign tool. Udall aide Bob Neuman later says he tries to be subtle, but when McCain figures out what Neuman wants, he bawls Neuman out using words the aide refuses to repeat. Neuman later says McCain was so extreme in his reaction that, as Silverman writes, he thought "there was something really wrong with the guy." McCain is running for Barry Goldwater's seat, with Goldwater's endorsement. But after the Keating scandal, Goldwater loses much of his respect for McCain, and, Silverman writes, "soon found he had to stop McCain from using his good name."

1986: McCain jokes to an audience from the National League of Cities and Towns, asking if they've heard "the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly, and left to die?" The punch line: "When she finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, 'Where is that marvelous ape?'" Neuman later says, "John McCain is the Eddie Haskell of politics. You can attribute that to me, and he'll kill me for it."

1987-1988: McCain battles against campaign finance reform, in part on behalf of his pal Keating.

April 12, 1988: Governor Evan Mecham (R-Lunatic) has just been impeached, and Democrat Rose Mofford, the Secretary of State, takes over the position. Mofford, a kindly lady with an astonishing snow-white beehive bouffant, is as non-partisan as one can be and still belong to a political party, gracious and well-liked by just about everyone in the state government. But not by McCain and some of his buds. (Disclaimer: Mrs. Max, who describes herself as either a Goldwater Republican or a Reagan Democrat depending on the day of the week, knows Mofford, and likes her tremendously.) McCain and his pals want to eject Mofford using the same recall process that was launched to yank Mecham. Eight days into her tenure, Mofford goes to DC to take part in what one aide later calls the "perfunctory wet kiss" meeting with the Arizona congressional delegation. The meeting is strictly ceremonial, or so most people think. Mofford is quite conversant with her duties as secretary of state, primarily the elections department. She doesn't know a great deal about the Central Arizona Project (CAP) or the technical details of water provision in that dry state. And in eight days, she hasn't been able to learn a hell of a lot. She speaks before the Senate Energy and Water Subcommittee on Appropriations about CAP. McCain is not a member of that committee, but his Republican buddy from Idaho, James McClure, is. McClure asks Mofford, in Silverman's words,

a series of questions that would leave any water expert's mouth dry. Her staff jumped in to try to answer, but even so, ultimately they had to file an addendum to the testimony.

Sandbagged. The publisher of the Arizona Republic, Pat Murphy, who considers himself a friend of McCain's, is "crushed" by the incident. It is, Silverman writes, "the beginning of the end of his respect for and friendship with McCain." During lunch, a "mischievously glee[ful]" McCain brags about his setup of Mofford. As Murphy recalls, "he had slipped some highly technical questions to [McClure] to ask Mofford--questions she wouldn't be prepared to answer or expected to answer. Flabbergasted, I asked McCain why would he want to sabotage Mofford's testimony, when in fact the CAP was the nonpartisan pet of Republicans and Democrats--such as far-left Udall and far-right Goldwater--since its inception. His reply, as near as I remember, was, 'I'll embarrass a Democrat any time I get the chance.'" Murphy accompanies McCain back to his office, where reporters ask about a rumor that McCain had tried to sabotage Mofford's testimony. Murphy is floored to hear him answer, in classic straight-talk fashion, "I'd never do anything like that." Murphy later learns that McCain had even brought in a private film crew to film the testimony for use in embarrassing Moffatt in the recall election. The Arizona Supreme Court strikes down the recall effort, so McCain's gamesmanship did little except destroy his friendship with Murphy and embitter Mofford. While she doesn't talk much about the McCains, having known Cindy since she was little, she will tell Silverman, the CAP hearing, "hurt me more than anything ... to be set up like that." She also says that McCain is "certainly no Barry Goldwater or Mo Udall."

Late 1980s: McCain hosts an event ostensibly to honor Goldwater, but in reality to raise funds for his Senate campaign. Goldwater initially refuses to participate and tells McCain to give half of the proceeds to the Arizona Republican Party. McCain retools the event to honor Reagan instead. Goldwater does speak at the event, but later writes to McCain, "You will recall during my speech at the dinner for the president in Phoenix, I announced that you were going to give half of the funds you raised to the State Republican Party. I am told by the Party, that you still owe them $35,000, and unless you pay all of it, or most of it, they cannot meet their payroll next Wednesday." McCain will continue to use Goldwater, a legend in Arizona politics, as well as Udall as a campaign touchstone for himself.

1990: Facing criticism over his relationship with Keating and an upcoming re-election battle, McCain flip-flops and becomes a proponent of campaign finance reform and reducing government spending. Silverman calls McCain's efforts "a farce. McCain famously sponsored a law designed to control special interests' grip on Washington, but at the same time, he took money from those interests." She adds details and links that I won't go into here, but her summation of his efforts: "sadly cosmetic." What he has done is take such a shrill stance against certain types of earmarks--pork, in the vernacular--that Arizona has lost out on federal funding for, among other worthy projects, a program at a Scottsdale hospital that trains military medical personnel in trauma care. Some of that training has been used in Iraq and Afghanistan, for those who were lucky enough to receive it before the program lost much of its funding. Silverman notes:

Arizona's political forefathers--Mo Udall, Barry Goldwater, Carl Hayden — pushed through one of the biggest pork barrel projects in the history of the United States Congress: the Central Arizona [Water] Project. If they hadn't, there wouldn't be much of a state to represent. As a native Arizonan, those are the politicians I grew up learning about. McCain just doesn't compare.

1991 and After: When Udall leaves Congress, McCain, who had voted with Udall on some environmental issues, quits supporting those issues, and begins to rack up low marks from environmental groups. One of his most recent is a zero from the League of Conservation Voters. He has refused to oppose efforts to mine uranium from sites perilously near the Grand Canyon, and refuses to support proposed changes to the Mining Act of 1872, oblivious to the fact that Arizona is a testament to the environmental degradation that comes with strip mining and other practices. He is well remembered for threatening the job of a Forest Service official who disagreed with him on the topic of the endangered Mount Graham red squirrel. However, in campaign appearances, McCain regularly invokes the name and environmental passion of Udall. In April 2008, Newsweek writes, "He traces his environmental awareness to the sainted Rep. Mo Udall, an Arizona Democrat who took McCain as a young congressman under his tutelage ... To environmentalists, that's like saying you learned about civil rights by driving around Alabama with Martin Luther King Jr." It's doubtful that Newsweek bothered to find much on the other side of the story.

Spring 1994: Silverman begins hearing rumors of Cindy McCain's addiction to prescription drugs. She learns of Tom Gosinski, who had been fired from his position as director of government and international affairs for Cindy McCain's nonprofit charity, the American Voluntary Medical Team (AVMT), which provides medical relief to poor countries. Gosinski had gone to the DEA and told them that Cindy McCain was using an AVMT doctor to illegally prescribe her drugs in her employees' names. Gosinski was one of those employees, and he was worried that he might be culpable. Cindy McCain had had numerous prescriptions written for her, some with as many as 500 pills on a single refill. Dr. John Max Johnson, her AVMT drug connection, told the DEA that she kept them in her personal luggage. Gosinski had not just ratted her out, but filed a wrongful-termination suit against the charity. That alerted John McCain's lawyer, John Dowd, to the situation. Dowd charged Gosinski with extortion. The extortion investigation produded public records that Silverman finds and uses for her reporting. But the McCains learn of her records request, and try to inoculate themselves against her reports, acknowledging Cindy's prescription drug addictions and blaming it on her back surgeries and the stress from the Keating scandal. They also claim, falsely, that Gosinski is trying to blackmail them. In her September 8, 1994 story, Silverman prints the following excerpt from Gosinski's personal journal, an entry from July 1992: "I have always wondered why John McCain has done nothing to fix the problem. He must either not see that a problem exists or does not choose to do anything about it. It would seem that it would be in everyone's best interest to come to terms with the situation. And do whatever is necessary to fix it. There is so much at risk ... During my short tenure at AVMT, I have been surrounded by what on the surface appears to be the ultimate all-American family. In reality, I am working for a very sad, lonely woman whose marriage of convenience to a U.S. Senator has driven her to: distance herself from friends; cover feelings of despair with drugs; and replace lonely moments with self-indulgences." Cindy avoids criminal charges by going into a drug rehab program.

1997: McCain is a frequent and steady visitor to Mo Udall, who is slowly dying of Parkinson's disease. Neuman is pleased with McCain's loyalty, but he is stunned when McCain brings reporter Michael Lewis with him to Udall's hospital bedside. (McCain is unable to wake Udall during the visit. Udall will die in 1998.) Neuman later recalls, "That was devastating to me, that he brought in a reporter. I thought that was crossing the line, and it destroyed me." Silverman writes, "I'm sure I would have accepted the offer to go the hospital, as well. I can't blame Lewis, but maybe the sight of the legendary Mo Udall in his final, sad days wasn't McCain's to share."

2000: As the presidential primaries heat up, Silverman flies to Washington to be interviewed by 20/20's Sam Donaldson on McCain. After the interview, Donaldson decides he doesn't want to report anything negative about McCain, and cans the interview. The same thing happens when she helps put together background research for 60 Minutes, when Mike Wallace decides he wants to do a positive story on McCain.

Whee doggies. And there's plenty more in the article: this is just the highlights. Even better, there are links to other New Times stories on McCain. So get to reading, and share the wealth.

Update: Amy Silverman writes in that an entire compendium of New Times links to stories about John McCain can be found on the Vintage McCain page on the newspaper's web site.

"Perception of pollution"

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 06:50:37 AM PDT

So four members of the US Olympic cycling team arrived in China, wearing face masks issued by the US Olympic Committee to protect against the city's oppressive pollution. Given their dependence on healthy lungs, it seems only logical they would protect themselves.

But it offended the Chinese. And the USOC leapt into full damage control mode, doing the Chinese's dirty propaganda work for them.

The USOC was sorry -- so very sorry -- that its band of cyclists embarrassed China by arriving at the Beijing airport wearing black pollution masks that made them look like stage-coach robbers.

"It wasn't the best judgment," said Jim Scherr, CEO of the USOC. "The athletes understand that now."

You can understand the athletes' confusion, though. The USOC did design the filter masks, distribute 200 of them to athletes and, by simple math, surely knew a few of them might wear them. Just not at the airport, in front of cameras.

The USOC made sure the cyclists understood this breach of guest etiquette by scolding them to tears, eliciting an official apology from Michael Friedman, Sarah Hammer, Bobby Lea and Jennie Reed: "Following our arrival on Tuesday, we offer our sincere apologies to BOCOG, the city of Beijing, and the people of China if our actions were in any way offensive. That was not our intent. ... We deeply regret the nature of our choices. Our decision was not intended to insult BOCOG or countless others who have put forth a tremendous amount of effort to improve the air quality in Beijing."

Beijing is a horrifically polluted city. Anyone with eyes (and a camera, as the picture on the right shows) can see that. Or satellite imagery.

As it gears up to host the 2008 Olympic Games Beijing has been awarded an unwelcome new accolade: the air pollution capital of the world.

Satellite data has revealed that the city is one of the worst environmental victims of China's spectacular economic growth, which has brought with it air pollution levels that are blamed for more than 400,000 premature deaths a year.

According to the European Space Agency, Beijing and its neighbouring north-east Chinese provinces have the planet's worst levels of nitrogen dioxide, which can cause fatal damage to the lungs.

For athletes that depend on a healthy respiratory system to be at their peak best, protecting their lungs from toxins that can "cause fatal damage to the lungs" would seem kind of important. Especially since in the course of training and competition, they'll be breathing more of it than the average mortal.

Still, Alfred Munzer, MD, director of pulmonary medicine at Washington Adventist Hospital and former president of the American Lung Association, says that shutting down factories and enforcing driving bans won't eliminate what's already in the air.

"During exercise, the movement of air in the lungs goes up about tenfold, which means exposure to air pollution goes up tenfold," Munzer says. "This has a severe affect on the respiratory tract. It will have an effect on healthy athletes."

But in the Orwellian world of Communist China, it leads to crazy passages as this one from the AFP report on the controversy:

The perception that Beijing's pollution, which prompted a shutdown of factories and reduction in auto travel during the Olympics, was so harmful that Olympians needed masks on arrival was seen as a slap in the face to organizers.

The "perception"? PERCEPTION?

Chris over at the cycling blog Podium Cafe vents:

Granted, if Mike Friedman, Bobby Lea, Sarah Hammer and Jennie Reed put the masks on for the cameras and made stump speeches about the environment, that'd be one thing. Instead, they were among the 200 athletes given the masks by the USOC. And if the Beijing hosts are touchy about pollution, they're in for a stiff dose of culture shock, in the form of media coverage that -- while far, far from perfect -- isn't going to swallow the up-is-down, day-is-night style of reporting the Chinese government typically demands. Seriously, "perception of pollution problems"... is this an Onion piece?

The Chinese have promised to give the international media free access to their country for the duration of the Olympics. If they're freaking out over this incident, it's going to be a long few weeks for them.

Open Thread

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 05:05:01 AM PDT

Your Abbreviated Pundit Round-up

Fri Aug 08, 2008 at 04:26:58 AM PDT

Eighty-eight days from now, we will be having ourselves a historic election.

David Brooks: Today I'm pretending to be a pseudo-intellectual and a poseur. Now, I know what you're thinking... that's what I get paid to do twice a week. But I thought I'd be explicit about it lest the technophiles get presumptuous ideas about where they fit in the social hierarchy.

Michael Gerson: You people just don't get it. George Bush, my former boss proved every day that if you just talk nonsense and avoid reality, the press won't pay attention to facts. Watch a master manipulator at work: Obama's maintaining his lead and that's good for McCain. See? All the Beltway heathers are asking why Obama's not ahead by more. If that doesn't drive home the point about how easily the press is manipulated, I don't know what does. Now don't ask why McCain is behind and can't ever catch up. That's a good reporter. Here's some BBQ.

Daniel Henninger: Obama and the Democrats are enviromaniacs, who along with Asylum Chief Al Gore are willing to forgo economic growth in favor of an untried and untested transformation of the American economy. They're bashing Big Oil when in reality it should be called Smart Oil, the only people with the knowledge and experience to produce energy on a world scale. And yes, I am writing this with a straight face.

Charles Krauthammer: Drill, drill, drill, drill, drill, drill.

Paul Krugman: When it comes to energy policy, Republicans really are the party of stupid.

In any case, remember this the next time someone calls for an end to partisanship, for working together to solve the country’s problems. It’s not going to happen — not as long as one of America’s two great parties believes that when it comes to politics, stupidity is the best policy.

Joe Conason: Let me take that one step further.

Touring America's oilrigs and nuclear plants, John McCain sometimes sounds as if he'll produce enough wind to power the nation all by himself. So strongly does his current rhetoric smell of methane -- the gas emanating from manure -- that he might even qualify for an alternative energy tax incentive.

Greg Hitt: The Democrats' new Southern strategy: run good candidates, and win. Even if they might be less progressive than Democrats elsewhere, they'll be responsible for a working majority in Congress.

Mark Blumenthal: More about 'likely' voters than you really want to know. Still, it's a good thing Alan Abramowitz looked into it. Otherwise, Gallup would have given us the impression young voters don't count.

Democracy Corps:

The most recent national survey of young voters conducted by Democracy Corps and Greenberg Quinlan Rosner finds that the last six weeks have not dulled young people’s support for Barack Obama, despite the inauguration of a Republican attack machine. The new research finds the same convincing margin (27 points) as last month.

Open Thread for Night Owls & Early Birds

Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 10:08:44 PM PDT

At Mother Jones, Justin Elliott writes:

Don't Know Much About History

In the summer of 2002, the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment (ONA) published an 85-page monograph called "Military Advantage in History." Unusual for an office that is headed by Andrew Marshall, the Pentagon's "futurist in chief," the study looks back to the past—way back. It examines four empires, or "pivotal hegemonic powers in history," to draw lessons about how the United States "should think about maintaining military advantage in the 21st century." Though unclassified, the study was held close to the vest; a stamp on the cover limits its dissemination without permission. Mother Jones obtained it only through a Freedom of Information Act request. Though the report is far from revelatory, it provides a window into a mindset that unselfconsciously envisions the United States as the successor to some of history's most powerful empires.

The study looks a little like a high school text book, devoting chapters to Alexander the Great, Imperial Rome, Genghis Khan, and Napoleonic France and citing texts by Sun Tzu, Livy, and Jared Diamond. It attempts to break down exactly how historic empires sustained their military might across continents and even centuries. The study posits that the historical examples offer "insights into what drives U.S. military advantage," as well as "where U.S. vulnerabilities may lie, and how the United States should think about maintaining its military advantage in the future." ...

Most striking is how the study conceives of the United States in imperial terms. "You'll see some neoconservatives at the beginning of the Bush administration crowing that 'we do have an empire, let's just come out of the closet and say we do,'" said Ivan Eland, the author of a book on America's "informal empire" and the director of the Center on Peace & Liberty at the Independent Institute, on hearing a description of the study. "But the administration never did that because empire doesn't sell well with the public." After reviewing the study at Mother Jones' request, William Hartung, director of the Arms and Security Initiative at the New America Foundation, said he was struck by its "arrogance and immorality." "The presumption that the United States should rule the world, sword at the ready, for the foreseeable future is an unacceptable basis for a just, even-handed foreign policy."

Elliott goes on to point out that it isn't just objectionable ideology to be found in the monograph, but factual inaccuracy as well. Given a chance to review the section on the transformation of the Roman Army over a period of 1000 years, Lee Brice of Western Illinois University, who is the president of the Society of Ancient Military Historians, described it as "so completely incorrect as to be useless."

The entire study, Brice said, is afflicted with "an intense, myopic habit of wanting to make the ancient world fit into modern stereotypes," something that might be expected in "much lower-undergraduate-level work."

It's become habitual over the past nearly eight years to tie such work to the machinations of the Cheney-Bush administration, but imperial thinking is no newcomer to American politics, nor the project of a single administration or two. In this case the idea for the study arose in 1999. Its five authors, employees of federal intelligence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, wrote it for the Information Assurance Technology Analysis Center - a Department of Defense operation that their company has run since 1998. Elliott notes that the Carlyle Group announced in May that it will be taking over Booz Allen's government services operation.

Just as the transformation of the United States from great power to American Empire was not done on the watch of a single administration, it will not be dismantled by a single one. Just getting started on such a project will require a commitment to actually want to dismantle and the political clout to move in that direction.

Gargantuan forces - including a deeply instilled belief among most Americans that the U.S. has no empire - form a strong counterweight to any such moves. One of the strongest of those forces is the election-killing theme that any leaders who try to reduce the imperial footprint - though they do not describe it as such - are "weak on defense." Overcoming that obfuscation, then, has to be the first step.

+ + +

The Overnight News Digest is posted..

Tinker, EMILY's List humiliated in TN-09

Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:32:48 PM PDT

Who knew, Democratic voters don't want to send a bigoted, union-busting lawyer to Congress. Nikki Tinker was trounced today in the Democratic primary in TN-09. With 89% of precincts reporting, incumbent Steve Cohen leads Tinker 79% to 19%.

It's a humiliation not just for the vile Tinker but also for those who endorsed her, especially EMILY's List and the DLC's Harold Ford, Jr. Her scurrilous, racist, anti-semitic attacks on the widely admired Cohen were so repulsive that in the last days before the primary EMILY's List felt obliged to renounce them. And so did her former employer, Harold Ford, though only a few hours before the polls closed. The humiliation for Tinker and her backers was not just the repudiation of her and her tactics that Tennessee voters delivered today. The deeper humiliation was the kind of campaign she ran, and the willingness of her backers to look the other way for so long. They've all lost face from this campaign.

Steve Cohen, on the other hand, deserves plaudits for rising above the muck and triumphing.

Open Thread and Diary Rescue

Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:20:35 PM PDT

Tonight's Rescue Rangers are jlms qkw, jennyjem, HansScholl, dadanation (pulling double duty), and ItsJessMe, with shayera editing.

jotter brings yesterday's High Impact Diaries: August 6, 2008.

va dare brings Top Comments 8.7.08 va dare goes to DC and MD.

Enjoy and please promote your own favorite diaries in this open thread.

More metaphors

Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 07:35:35 PM PDT

So we already discussed how McCain's bus got in a wreck (with a _blue_ van, no less). We know that Joe Lieberman was in the bus. Here's more about what happened inside the bus:

A little more to that Miami traffic accident yesterday involving Joe Lieberman aboard the Straight Talk Express: Turns out the impact sent a staffer's chocolate birthday cake with thick white frosting smack into the Connecticut senator

"At the moment of impact I was sitting in a booth ... right in front of counter right where the cake was. The cake went all over me. That was the end of my suit,'' he said, apologizing for the lack of suit for a taping of "Political Connections" on Bay News 9. "I always wondered whether sometime a political protester would hit me with a pie in the face. I never thought a friendly birthday cake would attack me from the rear."

One could spend a lifetime mining metaphors from this one incident alone.

WH to appeal Miers/Bolten subpoena decision

Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 06:50:06 PM PDT

Surprising precisely no one, the "administration" today moved to appeal the recent federal court ruling ordering Harriet Miers and Josh Bolten to appear before the House Judiciary Committee in response to their subpoenas.

AP:

Planning appeals, two senior White House advisers asked a judge Thursday to delay enforcement of his ruling that they have to testify before Congress.

White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers petitioned U.S. District Judge John Bates to place a hold on his ruling allowing White House aides to be subpoenaed by Congress.

Bates on July 31 rejected White House arguments that presidential confidants are protected from congressional subpoenas by executive privilege, giving free rein to Democrats who have been trying to get President Bush's aides to testify on the dismissal of nine federal prosecutors.

Obviously there's a good chance that this move runs out the clock on the issue, if the stay is granted. There's some indication from Bates' July 31st opinion that he's sensitive to the fact that the short time window a Congress has to enforce its subpoena power (House subpoenas expire with the adjournment of Congress at the end of its two-year term) has to be factored into the equation, but there's clearly no guarantee that Bates would deny the White House motion.

Without a stay in place, the Judiciary Committee would be looking to resume hearings with Miers and Bolten as witnesses in September, when the Congress returns from its August recess. Still unclear is exactly what happens if Miers and Bolten continue to refuse to appear even in the absence of a stay, or what recourse (if any) the House would have should they agree to appear, but decline to answer any questions on the grounds they originally claimed exempted them from having to show up -- that is, executive privilege.

Also still floating around out there somewhere: inherent contempt. Judge Bates did his best to discourage its use, preferring the use of the courts to settle these issues, if necessary. But a stay, should it be granted, would create incredible pressure on the Congress to resort to the very limited additional options open to it to enforce their rights before the issues were mooted by the end of its term.

Meanwhile, it's back to the waiting game for the House, now eyeing the close of the 110th Congress, the most important thing about winning the majority in which was supposed to be... "subpoena power."

Open Thread

Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 06:45:02 PM PDT

GOP online revolution - now with links!

Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 06:10:35 PM PDT

So did you hear the one about how the House Republicans are using the latest online tools to spread the word about their hippie sit-in?

Yeah, Twitter, Qik streaming video, YouTube, all that crap.

And a whole bunch of Republican Members left their mom's basements and their Cheetos behind, put on their suits, and came out to play Model Congress again this week. Because, well, they don't actually have any other jobs.

So there they were, busting their humps for their Sugar Daddies in the oil biz, but noticeably absent from the barricades was Republican Leader, Melanin Johnny Boehner.

Where was Boehner while his troops were Tweeting, streaming, blogging, IMing, and uploading?

Why, he was on the links, of course!

No, not the hyperlinks. The golf links.

Boehner was around for the start of the fake House session Friday but then left town and hasn't been back since. Even former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) showed up today to rally with his GOP comrades, but the current party leader was nowhere to be seen.

What's Boehner been up to? His office says he's been in Ohio raising money for his political action committee, the Freedom Project, and that he should be back in D.C. later this week. He's also doing 18 events in August for GOP candidates across the country.

But Boehner also has found time to squeeze in a couple rounds of golf. Scores reported by Boehner himself to a United States Golf Association site show that he posted an 85 sometime this week at his home course, Wetherington Golf & Country Club in West Chester, Ohio.

Ah, the marvels of the modern online life! (Good thing he has nothing to hide, eh?)

"Thks 4 ur support boss! Hope ur b-lo par!"


:: Next 18

Advertise on the Liberal Blog Advertising Network.

Hate ads? Subscribe.






Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!


On Mothertalkers:

Fame While Parenting: Is It Worth the Money?

Letting a Five-Month-Old Cry It Out?

Friday Open Thread

Running Red Lights a Killer

Fueling the Obesity Epidemic? Artificially Sweetened Beverage Use and Long-term Weight Gain

On Street Prophets:

The Rosy Crucifixion, or, The Comfort Of The Apocalypse

AFFIRMATION: Gay and Lesbian Mormons

The Evangelical Math

The Prayer Closet, a daily prayer request thread

TN-9 Memphis Voters Reject Anti-Semitism